?

Log in

 
 
14 July 2007 @ 12:13 am
secrets post #76  
1.


2.


3.


4.


5.


6.


7.


8.


9.


10.


11.


12.


13.


14.


15.


16.


17.


18.


19.


20.


21.


22.


23.


24.


25.


secrets left to be posted from submission post 76: 0
secrets posted to date: 1980 (a fine year!)
next secrets post: 20 july 2007 (SPOOKY)
submit: 77

There were actually like 9000 blingees submitted, but tbh they kind of stopped being funny after like... two. So that's all that I posted of them. Rentsecrets is, from here on out, a no blingees zone. How do you like me now, bitches?
 
 
Current Mood: exhausted
Current Music: dance music - the mountain goats
 
 
 
(Anonymous) on July 14th, 2007 10:27 pm (UTC)
Nina, oh, Nina, why do you do this? You just make yourself look even more pathetic than you already are, by replying and identifying yourself in 'secrets'. Most people wouldn't even know if you hadn't posted this.

BTW, dreams of Broadway? Better start finding some alternate dreams, honey.
Colleen: shoesschizophrenic0 on July 14th, 2007 11:52 pm (UTC)
"Most people wouldn't even know if you hadn't posted this."

Yes, because the secret maker did such an A+ job at covering her name (and at spelling "Rentsecrets" for that matter).

I must say I find it thoroughly amusing that one of the most crappily made secrets in this week batch is talking about how someone else's secrets are poorly made.
(Anonymous) on July 15th, 2007 02:48 am (UTC)
For 23, it's not the quality of the secret that counts. It's the fact that it gets the message across. It got the message across really well!

Nina sucks. Her secrets suck. Her obsession with KT is disturbing and freaky.
Colleen: shoesschizophrenic0 on July 15th, 2007 03:10 am (UTC)
But see, it does matter, because the secret maker complains about Nina's secrets being poorly made, yet this secret is also poorly made. Also, I find secrets like #23 as stupid and annoying as the majority of secrets.

By the by, I find your (and others') obsession with Nina equally disturbing and freaky. Seriously, guys, get a hobby.
(Anonymous) on July 15th, 2007 03:13 am (UTC)
We can't. Not when she shoves her existance into our faces at every turn.

We don't constantly quote her.

Did you ever stop to consider that maybe the creator of 23 knows that their secret is poorly made? They know it is poorly made, but have no way of fixing it. Think about that why don't you?
Colleen: pic#62552485schizophrenic0 on July 15th, 2007 03:45 am (UTC)
"We can't. Not when she shoves her existance into our faces at every turn."

Yes, and it's not as though IMDb has an "Ignore" option or anything.

"We don't constantly quote her."

Never said you did.

"Did you ever stop to consider that maybe the creator of 23 knows that their secret is poorly made? They know it is poorly made, but have no way of fixing it. Think about that why don't you?"

So you're saying it's okay for the creator of 23 to make crappy secret, but it isn't okay for Nina to make crappy secrets? Yeah, that's not hypocritical or anything. Fact is, you just look like an ass if you refer to someone else's secrets as being poorly made and your secret is just as poorly made. It's like accusing someone else of having poor spelling skills when your post about said person's spelling skills is filled with spelling errors.
(Anonymous) on July 15th, 2007 03:50 am (UTC)
Obviously you are too ignorant and simple minded to understand my point. I will not waste my time attempting to reason with you.

I also never said I was from IMDb.
Colleen: riseschizophrenic0 on July 15th, 2007 03:54 am (UTC)
"Obviously you are too ignorant and simple minded to understand my point."

Yes, how ignorant and simple-minded of me to recognize and point out you (and the secret maker's) hypocrisy.

Ninatechnicolornina on July 18th, 2007 10:56 pm (UTC)
And how, pray tell, do I "shove my existence in your face?" And just so you know, it's spelled "existence," not "existance." Get a dictionary, why don't you?

I don't constantly quote KT, either. For awhile I had something she said as my signature on IMDb because I thought it was funny. (And still do.) I think for awhile it was also a David Bowie quote, and if it wasn't, that was by sheer oversight on my part, because Bowie is fucking AWESOME. The fact that I quote him doesn't mean I'm obsessed with him. It just means I think he said something cool and repeat-worthy.

A five-year-old could do a better editing job than that, too, just so you know.